Used Services and Cookies

Our website uses cookies to enhance your user experience. Some cookies are essential for the operation and management of the site, while others are used for anonymous statistics or personalized content. Please note that limiting cookie use may impair certain functions of the website.

More information: Imprint, Data protection

Essential cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website or, for example, saving your cookie settings. The website cannot function properly without these cookies. This category cannot be deactivated.
  • Name:
    ukie_a_cookie_consent_manager
  • Domain:
    blomstein.com
  • Purpose:
    Stores the cookie preferences of website visitors.
  • Name:
    blomstein_session
  • Domain:
    blomstein.com
  • Purpose:
    The session cookie is essential for the basic functioning of the website. It allows users to navigate through the site and use its basic features.
  • Name:
    XSRF-TOKEN
  • Domain:
    blomstein.com
  • Purpose:
    This cookie serves security purposes and aids in preventing Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. It is a technical necessity.
These cookies collect information about how you use a website, e.g. which pages you have visited and which links you have clicked on.
  • Name:
    _ga
  • Domain:
    blomstein.com
  • Purpose:
    The Google Analytics cookie _ga is used to distinguish users by assigning a unique identification number to each visitor. This number is sent to Google Analytics each time a page is accessed in order to collect user, session and campaign data and to statistically evaluate the use of the website. The cookie helps website operators to understand how visitors interact with the website by collecting information anonymously and generating reports.
  • Name:
    _ga_*
  • Domain:
    blomstein.com
  • Purpose:
    The _ga_[container_id] cookie, specific to Google Analytics 4 (GA4), is used to distinguish website visitors by assigning a unique ID for each session and each user. It enables the collection and analysis of data on user behavior on the website in anonymized form. This includes tracking page views, interactions and the path users take on the website to give website operators deeper insights into the use of their site and improve the user experience.
  • Name:
    _gid
  • Domain:
    blomstein.com
  • Purpose:
    The _gid cookie is a cookie set by Google Analytics that is used to distinguish users. It assigns a unique identification number to each visitor to the website, which is sent to Google Analytics each time the page is accessed. This makes it possible to track and analyze user behavior on the website over a period of 24 hours.
  • Name:
    _gat_gtag_UA_77241503_1
  • Domain:
    blomstein.com
  • Purpose:
    The _gat_gtag_UA_77241503_1 cookie is part of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager and is used to throttle the request rate, i.e. it limits data collection on high traffic websites. This cookie is linked to a specific Google Analytics property ID (in this case UA-77241503-1), which means that it is used for performance monitoring and control of data collection for that specific website property.

End of Year Competition Law Roundup

15.12.2016

Over the last two weeks a number of important events for the antitrust community took place. Competition officials from across Europe shared some interesting insights and outlooks on 2017 which we would like to pass on to you in order to alert you to some developments to expect.

Vertical Enforcement

Andreas Mundt, president of the Federal German Cartel Office (FCO), announced at the annual meeting of Studienvereinigung Kartellrecht on 1 December that the FCO will publish their long awaited ‘Draft Vertical Guidelines’ still before Christmas. The need for such guidelines was triggered by the uncertainty that manufacturers and retailers, mostly in the food sector, were facing after the FCO’s large investigation into vertical restraints and resale price maintenance and the substantial fines imposed for such conduct. The last outstanding fining decisions in these proceedings were issued earlier today.

There was an internal consultation process during which the FCO sought insights from various practitioners, including a group of experienced antitrust lawyers of which our partner Anna Huttenlauch formed part. Now, the FCO will launch a public consultation inviting all stakeholders to provide their views.

Convergence / Digital economy

Over the past years, the FCO has been a pioneer in antitrust enforcement in the digital economy in Europe. Apart from notable enforcement decisions regarding selective distribution systems / platform bans, most favourite nation clauses or data-related conduct of dominant firms, the FCO has published several policy papers (see e.g. our previous briefing). At a conference in Brussels on 7 December, the activity of competition authorities in the digital economy not only in Germany but also in other member states was discussed.

Andreas Mundt reacted to policymakers’ aspiration to regulate issues such as the “free flow of data” between platforms. Mundt commented that tech giants such as Google, Facebook and Apple should see the FCO as an ally, since competition law enforcement would be more flexible and efficient than legislation in order to tackle antitrust concerns related to online platforms. In March 2016, the FCO had opened an investigation against Facebook. Because of the social network’s popularity, it is suspected that users have no choice but to accept Facebook’s terms of service even where these are in violation of data protection laws. Such conduct, according to the FCO, could amount to an abuse of market power.

Chris Fonteijn, head of The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM), announced that the ACM will soon publish the results of its sector inquiry into the market for online platforms streaming videos and movies. These may eventually provide more clarity on which conduct is considered harmful in relation to platforms and which not and reduce some of the uncertainty manufacturers and retailers are currently facing in relation to platform bans while the Coty decision is pending at the European Court of Justice. The sector inquiry was launched on 21 September 2016 and not only looks into the conduct of platforms but also associated business activities, such as digital marketplaces and content producers. At the time of its launch, the ACM also published a paper dealing with the role of consumers’ data in the assessment of market power of online platforms and the role of competition law enforcement as a means of data privacy protection.

The French Competition Authority (FCA) launched a sector inquiry into the online advertising sector in May 2016. Isabelle de Silva, the FCA’s new president, announced that results will be published in 2017. Also, a decision of the authority on the competitive landscape in the pay and free TV sector is expected for July 2017. The FCA had launched a public consultation in July 2016 in order to determine whether the injunctions it had imposed on the acquisition of TPS, a company offering subscription television packages via satellite, by the Canal Plus Group in 2012 should be renewed for another 5 years. This was especially aimed at analysing the changes in the market brought by new actors such as Netflix and other “over-the-top” offers.

Harmonisation of Procedural Rules

At a conference in Berlin hosted by the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy, Armin Jungbluth, head of Competition and Consumer Policy, spoke about latest developments regarding the harmonisation of procedural rules within the EU. The European Commission’s initiative “ECN+” pushes for further harmonisation of competition procedures and aims at empowering national competition authorities (NCAs) to be more effective enforcers. ECN+ focuses on four key areas: (i) independence of NCAs; (ii) enforcement toolbox of NCAs; (iii) fining powers of NCAs; and (iv) leniency programmes (i.e. one-stop-shop model). The initiative was subject to public consultation earlier in 2016. According to Armin Jungbluth, a draft EU Directive can be expected in early 2017. After the Damages Directive, this would be the second Commission harmonisation initiative in a short time period in this area of the law.

Competition Law Reform

In Germany, the competition law reform implementing the Damages Directive and some adjustments considered necessary in order to meet challenges brought about by the digital economy (e.g. introducing a transaction value based threshold for merger control) will probably enter into force in Q2 2017. The draft law (see our previous briefing) is still undergoing minor adjustments, in particular relating to transitional rules on limitation periods for “old cases” while the bulk of the rules implementing the Damages Directive are expected to be passed unchanged.

The introduction of a transaction value based threshold is also considered at EU level. The European Commission has launched a public consultation and invited stakeholders to provide their views until 13 January 2017. Parallel to the discussion in Germany, thoughts for revision were particularly triggered by the Facebook/WhatsApp transaction. Despite a purchase price of USD 19 billion it was not notifiable in Brussels as WhatsApp had virtually no turnover and could only be reviewed by the Commission following referrals. The introduction of a transaction value based threshold would also impact other sectors, such as the pharmaceutical sector, where companies with a high market potential may not have yet generated high revenues at the time of transaction.

At EU level, the debate on a possible review of minority shareholdings has been considered mute since Commissioner Margrethe Vestager demonstrated significant doubts on the benefit of such a reform. The debate may however come back to life in light of two recently published economic studies on common ownership, which show that a small list of large institutional shareholders own large minority stakes in numerous companies that are active the same industry.

In concentrated markets, such common ownership can have a negative impact on competition since the institutional shareholder will not be interested in the competitive performance of “their” company but only in the good overall performance of the industry. In light of the recent findings, it does not seem unlikely that the FCO and other European competition authorities will turn their attention to minority shareholdings of institutional shareholders and closely monitor compliance with the law in the near future.

We will continue to monitor the developments described closely.

For further information please contact:

Dr. Anna Huttenlauch (anna.huttenlauch@blomstein.com)
Dr. Max Klasse (max.klasse@blomstein.com)

back to overview