Wir wachsen weiter und stärken unser Team durch herausragende Talente. Zum 1. Juli 2025 gibt es gleich fünf Beförderungen: Dr. Christopher Wolters und Dr. Leonard Freiherr von Rummel werden Partner; Ramona Ader, Dr. Laura Louca und Philipp Trube steigen in die Counsel-Riege auf. Mit diesen Ernennungen setzen wir auf kontinuierliches, organisches Wachstum und starke individuelle Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten für alle Karrierestufen und in allen Praxisgruppen.

Amid escalating global trade tensions, the European Union (EU) faces significant challenges as U.S. President Donald Trump announced new tariffs impacting EU exports and sending shockwaves to the capital markets. A 20% tariff on all EU imports starting April 5, 2025 were introduced. These measures are claimed to reduce the U.S. trade deficit and bolster domestic manufacturing. As an affected company, you can check this list of exempted products not subject to the 20% additional tariffs. However, please be aware that some of these products are subject to their own tariffs, such as the 25% tariff on imported automobiles and automobile parts.

As part of the Omnibus package (see our briefing here), the EU Commission suggested simplifications and improvements to the CBAM Regulation. The proposal aims to simplify and enhance the cost-efficiency of the CBAM Regulation while ensuring that its environmental objectives and core design principles remain intact. Key measures focus on easing compliance for importers by streamlining reporting requirements, particularly those involving complex calculations and extensive data collection.

Before the EU proposals become legally binding, they must go through the ordinary legislative procedure at the European level. Until this is achieved, every importer of CBAM goods should register as an authorized CBAM declarant in the CBAM registry, which is possible since 31 March 2025. We outline the details.

Two months after the European Commission published its Competitiveness Compass, we take a deeper look into its strategic vision to enhance the EU’s economic resilience and global competitiveness (following up on our first overview), namely the competition law aspects. The Commission is rather clear that it seeks to establish Europe’s competitiveness as the new “North Star”. However, what is not so clear: Through which paths will the Commission lead us on our journey to this North Star?

The increased political focus on climate and environmental protection has a particular impact on trade with chemicals. In an amendment to the REACH Regulation at the end of 2024, the European Commission banned the use of certain chemicals due to the risk of contamination. In this part of our ESG Briefing series, we provide an overview of the key provisions of the REACH Regulation and its latest amendments.

The European defence industry is undergoing profound strategic transformation. Just last week, the Commission has published its White Paper for European Defence Readiness 2030, attesting “changes of a magnitude not seen since 1945” and boldly stating: “History will not forgive us for inaction.” This shift has also been felt in competition law. Recent policy discussions suggest that the traditional approach to competition enforcement — focusing primarily on market dynamics and consumer welfare — may evolve to incorporate additional considerations, in particular defence interests.

After the Oscar-worthy performance in its opening act, the DMA series is back with a brand-new season, packed with twists, turns, and regulatory cliffhangers. On March 19, 2025, the European Commission stepped into the spotlight with two decisive moves: First, it handed Apple a script rewrite, demanding new specified measures to meet interoperability obligations under the DMA. Second, it preliminarily found Alphabet in breach of the DMA by self-preferencing in Google Search and enforcing restrictive steering rules in Google Play.

In Anbetracht der akuter werdenden Bedrohungslage, getrieben insbesondere durch zunehmende Zweifel an der Bündnistreue der USA und der dadurch hervorgerufenen Einschränkung der von ihr auf die europäischen Staaten projizierten konventionellen wie atomaren Abschreckung, stellt sich die Frage: Wie gut ist Deutschland auf eine weitere Verschärfung der Konflikte, insbesondere dem mit Russland, vorbereitet? Sollte die asymmetrische Kriegsführung – unter anderem – gegen Deutschland noch weitreichendere Konsequenzen haben, welche rechtlichen Instrumente stehen dem Staat zur Verfügung, um in einem äußeren oder inneren Notstand handlungsfähig zu bleiben? Dieses Briefing beleuchtet die bislang eher stiefmütterlich behandelten Sicherstellungs- und Vorsorgegesetze, die für solche Situationen die notwendigen Instrumentarien zur Verfügung stellen (sollen).

In times of escalating trade wars (see our latest briefing on the EU’s response to the U.S.’ steel and aluminum tariffs), businesses face significant challenges due to increased tariffs, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical uncertainties. To navigate these complexities, we have put together 8 strategies business can apply while highlighting potential risks.

Already the first Trump administration has restricted international trade by imposing tariffs of up to 25% on imports of steel and aluminium from the European Union (EU), provoking countermeasures by the EU. In 2021, these measures ceased to apply after the EU and United States (US) reached a corresponding agreement. On 12 March 2025, the US revived the tariffs. Again, the action has prompted the EU to implement countermeasures.